Skip to content

Supreme Court of Canada charts path for reviewing validity of government regulations

Review should be aimed at whether an agency has acted within the scope of its lawful authority
web1_20241108121136-20241108121116-4ad40f12f4f45e8dd202671888e5c6b3314d5b86c579443caef73e97cc0331d3
The shadow from a Royal Canadian Air Force CC-330 Husky is seen as it passes the Supreme Court of Canada, during a flypast celebrating the RCAF centennial, on Canada Day, on Monday, July 1, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Justin Tang

The Supreme Court of Canada has clarified the legal path for judges when reviewing the validity of government regulations, guidelines or other such instruments.

In a pair of decisions, the Supreme Court points to a previous top court ruling that set out a comprehensive framework for determining the applicable standard of review.

The court says a standard for gauging reasonableness, set out in that framework, is presumed to apply when reviewing government regulations and other rules.

It says a court’s role is to review the legality or validity of such regulations, not to weigh whether they are necessary, wise or effective in practice.

As a result, it is not an inquiry into the underlying political, economic, social or partisan considerations.

Rather, the review should be aimed at whether an agency has acted within the scope of its lawful authority.

Jim Bronskill, The Canadian Press





 
Pop-up banner image