Petition coming for bylaw to protect large, healthy trees

Large trees add liveability to a neighbourhood

Petition coming for bylaw to protect large, healthy trees

On April 17, I will be presenting a paper petition to North Cowichan council, signed by 500 North Cowichan residents, requesting a bylaw to protect all large, healthy trees. This petition is not about protecting ALL trees, nor is it intended to interfere with development. Neither does it present criteria for determining which trees are to be protected. I would leave that to council, perhaps in consultation with other municipalities that have similar bylaws, such as Duncan, Surrey, Saanich, Vancouver, Victoria, Nanaimo, Abbotsford, Coquitlam, Richmond, Penticton and Kamloops, to name a few.

I will primarily talk about why all property owners should want protection on large healthy trees on or near their properties. Large trees add liveability to a neighbourhood through visual enhancement, by physically oxygenating and cooling the air and houses, and by removing toxins, making air more breathable. Large, healthy trees mitigate flooding and provide needed windbreaks. The roots of large native trees can reach tens of metres into the ground, preventing landslides caused by excessive rain, earth tremors and erosion. This is especially important to consider in our area, where much housing is on hillsides and not sited on bedrock.

This danger is dramatically illustrated by some disastrous events that have happened, or are now happening, near our region because of developments built on or under clearcuts. On Whidbey Island, north of Seattle, a development built on a clearcut hillside is slowly sliding down to the beach, house by house, as homeowner watch helplessly. This has been covered by ABC News and NBC news.

A large landslide in Oso, Washington, killed 49 people in their homes. In before and after aerial photos of the slide, one can see that the forested area had been recently clearcut just above the destruction.

Yes, there will be a cost to such a bylaw. New free-standing houses will cost more, but there are many options for lower cost housing, such as higher density projects. Consulting arborists will be needed to assess trees. These consultants would save North Cowichan a lot of money in storm damage by removing weak and diseased trees that pose a danger to roadways and communities.

I want to emphasize that this petition is not against development. My father was a property developer and my daughter is a builder. Developers and builders are valuable for the very important role they play in providing habitat for us all. But what we are seeing all over our municipality is a repetitive series of cookie-cutter developments on clearcut land. As they are naturally creative people, I would prefer to ask developers to become even more creative, rather than endlessly employing the same tired templates, so tediously repeated across North America. If we ask them to, they can and will create exciting and interesting neighbourhoods by leaving the large trees in place, as was commonly done only 10 or 20 years ago.

But I understand that North Cowichan doesn’t even enforce provincial restrictions on clearing trees along fish-bearing streams. This neglect and rampant clearcutting is costing us the beauty of our communities.

This bylaw will also impact private property owners. Some will say that no one can tell a property owner what they must or must not do on their own land. And yet, we do place such restrictions on unsightly or noisy properties because they devalue their neighbourhoods. Everyone’s property is either enhanced or degraded by their neighbourhood and everyone’s property contributes to the enhancement, or otherwise, of their neighbour’s properties. And large trees make neighbourhoods more pleasant by increasing one’s sense of well-being, thus raising property values.

Victoria is rapidly growing, perhaps approaching 500,000. When some form of railway becomes a viable commuter option — and sooner or later, it will have to, council will be under even more pressure from developers. Try to picture our Valley covered with template, cookie-cutter, almost treeless developments. At that point, we will become just another faceless North American suburb. I believe now is the time for council to determine how this expanded development push will play out.

Cynthia Montgomery

Maple Bay

Just Posted

What you said: the solutions to the Highway 18 elk situation are varied

Is it the speed of drivers, the at-times-blind corners, or the poor lighting?

Cowichan Valley farmers argue for repeal of Bill 52

Limits on farm dwellings, other issue, raise concerns

Cowichan School District’s ‘Hello Dolly’ offers space for cultural questions

SD79 presents bi-weekly video series with Cowichan Elder

Duncan Sikh community marks founder’s 550th birthday

Guru Nanak is revered as founder of Sikhism

‘Kind of lacking:’ Injured Bronco wonders why Canada won’t fund spinal surgery

“I think if Canada can step in and advance this program”

Police negotiate with man barricaded in Victoria synagogue

Children evacuated from daycare on site

Dance cancelled after Alberta teacher’s climate lesson prompts online threats

School district near Red Deer cancelled annual family dance due to Facebook comments

Feds not enforcing standards on Hungarian duck imports, B.C. farmer says

‘You have no way of knowing what’s in the bag’

In surprise move, defence won’t call witnesses for accused in Abbotsford school killing

‘Change of instructions’ results in defence closing case without calling evidence

B.C. VIEWS: An engine that hums right along

First Nations are leading a new surge of investment in B.C.

74% of 911 calls are from cellphones, so know your location: E-Comm

Cell tower triangulation generally only narrows location down to the block someone is calling from

No negligence in RCMP actions in B.C. teen’s overdose death: Watchdog

Police acted properly when they responded to the first reports of the boy being in distress

320 years since the ‘Big One’ doesn’t mean it’s overdue: B.C. professor

‘It could happen today, tomorrow or 100 years from now’

Most Read