The supply of affordable housing — factors leading to illegal construction

One concern with secondary suites is obviously that many of them are carried out without permit.

The supply of affordable housing — factors leading to illegal construction

I have spent the last 30 years as an engineer working on renovations of buildings in Vancouver and throughout British Columbia. Much of that time involved assessing buildings and developing a strategy that worked to reduce the costs of construction. Many of these projects involved adapting buildings and converting them to residential use.

In the early years of my practice, upgrading requirements were more reasonable — based on good fire engineering practice. Then the legal process of stratification took hold and we were forced in many cases to fully upgrade buildings even though much of the work was not significantly increasing the level of safety. Increased upgrading requirements have substantially increased costs and this is reflected in reduced availability of housing and higher rents.

The most obvious example of where governments can help with the availability of affordable housing is with the legalisation of secondary suites.

Most secondary suites are carried out without permit. This is a significant concern as municipalities need to facilitate legal construction if they are to bring more residential units on stream.

I recently decided to undertake renovations on a house that we purchased and to do this with a formal building permit application. This worked well until I received my tax bill for the property. My taxes went from $4,800 to $6,000-plus per annum. The building is a pre-manufactured home so, in my view, this is excessive.

It turns out that even if you already have the water and sewer service provided in the house, you will be charged for double the service compared to a single-family dwelling.

Admittedly, the cost of both water service and sewer service is significant, if the house is new. New connections are typically charged by the municipality depending on the size and lengths of connections.

If the house already exists and no new services are required there is no increase in the cost of infrastructure: water mains, sewers etc. In theory there is an increase in the volume of water and sewage service provided and some increase in costs to the municipality.

Typically, however, costs with water and sewer are either of an investment nature — water works/pipe works for instance- or operational costs, pumping of water/treatment etc. New service tends to require investment in infrastructure while operating costs are increased marginally as suites are added.

Why then is a totally new service charge applicable to a secondary suite? With new construction a much larger house on a new lot can have unlimited families in it without incurring such charges.

To charge legal suites a disproportionate amount for these services simply widens the gap, increasing work that is not carried out with permit. It also imposes punitive taxes on those who choose to undertake work through the formal building permit process. The choice for new suites is either to carry out the work without permit, which could incur penalties, or to use a formal building permit process leading to unreasonably high water and sewage taxes. This is one example of how governments work against innovation and investment.

The result is disproportionally high taxes on legally constructed secondary suites. This swings the balance towards illegal construction. For illegal suites, the owner gets the benefit of lower taxes while the municipality bears the increased operational costs.

We are fortunate to have a relatively good system for dealing with permits on the island compared to the very slow, bureaucratic system in Vancouver. But we do need to re-examine how we facilitate new housing capacity. Much of the charges that apply are simply based on an outdated model for cost recovery. Why not provide an incentive for construction of legal secondary suites?

If we do not address the unfair taxes applied to legal suites then there will be a diminishing supply of housing and not surprisingly, an increasingly energetic administration determined to squeeze more blood out of the stone.

John Ivison

Maple Bay

Just Posted

Do you know the rules for backyard burning in North Cowichan?

“Know the rules and check before you burn!” warns the municipality’s website.

Lynne Smith humbled by mandate given to her by Saltair/Thetis voters

New Area G director looking forward to the challenge and representing her community well

Amazing artist JW-Jones brings his act to the Osborne Bay Pub in Crofton

Live act by a master bluesman something to see and hear

Acclaimed organist Michael Bloss performs at St. John’s Cobble Hill on Oct. 28

The parish church of St. John the Baptist in Cobble Hill will… Continue reading

Exclusive Quamichan stop for huge map of Indigenous Canada

It takes up the better part of a room, and is highly detailed, offering a new look at Canada

B.C. sailor surprised by humpback whale playing under her boat

Jodi Klahm-Kozicki said the experience was ‘magical’ near Denman Island

Election watchdog seeks digitally savvy specialists to zero in on threats

Move follows troublesome evidence of online Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election

More court before Dutch man charged in Amanda Todd case is extradited here

Appeals must be dealt with in Europe, before charges faced in B.C.

Crown says man guilty of B.C. girl’s 1978 murder based on alleged confession

Jury hears details of girl’s 1978 murder while Crown says man should be convicted of girl’s murder based on alleged confession.

BCHL alumni has NHL jersey retired by Anaheim Ducks

Paul Kariya played with the Penticton Vees from 1990-1992

CFL playoff picture still muddled heading into weekend action

League revealed last week no fewer than 64 potential playoff permutations

New monitoring of vessel noise impact on endangered whales announced

Federal government to monitor underwater ship and mammal noise in B.C.’s Salish Sea

Most Read