Decision on blow downs rushed, no public input

The community assembly, organized by Where Do We Stand, was a full house

Decision on blow downs rushed, no public input

Last week, three meetings about the forests occurred: Monday, the Forestry Advisory Committee meeting; Tuesday, the Public Assembly for the Community Forests at the Performing Arts Centre; Wednesday, a council meeting resulting in a critical forest decision about harvesting the wind throw.

The community assembly, organized by Where Do We Stand, was a full house, with hundreds of people lining up at the last moment to buy tickets. PAC called it an unprecedented event.

If we ever needed evidence of public concern, interest, and commitment to looking for new ways to manage the forests, the community assembly has given council the support it needs to create a new vision with public participation.

Most councillors attended. We were grateful to the mayor and Councillor Douglas for speaking at the event. So, when we learned, 24 hours later, that the municipality had added a last minute 25-page Forestry Advisory Committee report to the agenda for the council meeting the next day, to decide about harvesting of the windfall, we were, to say the least, disappointed. Twenty-five pages at the last moment, with no effort to alert the public, feels like a flawed process.

On Wednesday, a few hours after the public assembly, with no public attendance, council was put in a position of having to rush through a decision about the blow down. WDWS has sent a letter to council with concerns expressed by citizens sharing through WDWS about the following issues:

One, there was inadequate time for the public and council to be made aware of the blow down item on the council agenda, therefore there was no public participation.

Two, it appears there was not enough time for council to assimilate the 25-page FAC report. Furthermore, the report does not seem to reflect the broad range of ecological concerns presented by two new FAC members appointed to balance the conventional/commercial logging perspective.

Three, the public and council deserve the opportunity to hear from experts from an ecological and ecosystem-based forestry background about the need for an ecological assessment of the harvest.

Council has demonstrated its commitment to public participation. We are pausing to hear and understand where they stand.

Where Do We Stand

Cowichan

Just Posted

North Cowichan/Duncan RCMP looking for missing woman

Angela Marie Mitchell, 35, was last seen on May 16

Performing in ‘Mamma Mia!’ all summer is dream come true for two actresses

They’ve been friends for years, and now Roth and Burke get to play friends onstage

Drivesmart column: Turning right at a Sechelt four-way-stop

Passing on the right is forbidden in this circumstance but that does not stop many drivers.

Police say it’s “impressive” no arrests were made after Raptors celebrations

Toronto will play the Western Conference champion Golden State Warriors next

Coming up in Cowichan: From bike rodeo to ‘A Word About Consent’, lots on the calendar

Christian Science event coming to Duncan Saturday, May 25 “Breaking News: Freedom… Continue reading

Social media giants in hot seat as politicians consider regulations in Ottawa

Committee members will also grill representatives from Facebook, Twitter

Wildfire crews watching for dangerous wind shift in High Level, Alta.

The Chuckegg Creek fire is raging out of control about three kilometres southwest of the town

UN urges Canada to take more vulnerable Mexican migrants from Central America

The request comes as the United States takes a harder line on its Mexican border

Mistrial declared in Jamie Bacon murder plot trial

Bacon was on trial for counselling to commit the murder of Person X

B.C. VIEWS: Money-laundering melodrama made for TV

Public inquiry staged to point fingers before 2021 election

Canadian homebuyers escaping high housing costs by moving to secondary cities

In British Columbia, exurbs have grown in the Hope Valley and Kamloops

Most Read